Sunday, October 29, 2006

The Hypocrisy of Homosexual "Marriage"

Interesting article by Kevin McCullough. Despite their incessant claims that they are entitled to "marriage", McCullough makes a compelling argument that homosexuals are not sincere about marriage. To the contrary, he claims that their real agenda is to destroy the institution of marriage.
Radical homosexual activists hate biblical marriage, because in order to achieve its benefits and blessings they must first conform to God's plan for the sexual actions, and the sinful nature in man is not willing to make such submission and conformity happen. The existence of joyful biblical marriage being practiced, by "thumpers" in "Jesusland" infuriates them and thus the only action they can attempt is to destroy the institution that allows such fundamental societal success to happen.
Though not addressed directly in the article, there is a fundamental flaw to both the argument for homosexual "marriage" and, whether accurate or not, McCullough's argument that the agenda of the homosexual lobby is to detroy marriage.

Marriage is created by God; it is not a secular institution. Politicians and courts can pass laws and hand down decisions promoting homosexual "marriage", but the reality is, no matter what they call it, they can not alter the nature of marriage.

Think of it this way. You might want to be a cat; and you may want to be one really bad. You could even persuade Congress to pass a law declaring you a cat, or get a friendly judge to rule that you are entitled to be a cat with all the rights and privileges of being a cat. Go ahead: chase mice, shred the back of the couch, pee in a big kitty litter pan. It doesn't matter. You still won't be a cat -- it's not in your nature.

Similarly, neither homosexual activists, nor liberal politicians, nor activist judges can destroy marriage because it not a human institution.

No comments:


Blog Archive